Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi

Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi

Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi

Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi

User: CNBC-TV18

Views: 135

Uploaded: 2020-01-02

Duration: 13:49