Iowa Caucus Results Arebr Riddled With Errors, Analysis Reveals According to 'The New York Times,' br the inconsistencies are not likely to br significantly affect the winner's margin of lead. But several types of errors br were discovered in the reported br results of more than 100 Iowa voting precincts. The errors include missing br data, contradictory or impossible br reporting and other types of errors. Analysis by 'The New York Times' br reveals that the errors do not seem to br be intentional, but some are significant. This means that due br to the slim victory margin Buttigieg br currently has over Bernie Sanders, there could be further delays br once 100 percent of the precincts br have reported their results. 97 percent of Iowa precincts br have currently reported results. The Iowa Democratic Party br has received a great deal of criticism br due to delays and confusion related to the caucuses. Most of the confusion has been br blamed on a vote tallying and reporting br app created by company Shadow Inc.