Supreme Court Allows Biden Administration To End Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy

Supreme Court Allows Biden Administration To End Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy

Supreme Court Allows , Biden Administration To End , Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy.br Supreme Court Allows , Biden Administration To End , Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy.br On June 30, the Supreme Court ruledbr that the Biden administration can repeal br the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols.br On June 30, the Supreme Court ruledbr that the Biden administration can repeal br the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols.br The "Remain in Mexico" policy forced migrants br seeking asylum in the United States to br stay in Mexico while awaiting hearings.br The policy was put in place by the Trump administration br to prevent migrants from being released into the U.S. br while waiting for a decision from immigration.br The policy was put in place by the Trump administration br to prevent migrants from being released into the U.S. br while waiting for a decision from immigration.br The Biden administration's previous attempts to repeal the policy were blocked by a lower court.br Fox News reports that the issue in question was whether the Department of Homeland Security's termination of the policy was a violation of federal law. .br Texas and Missouri reportedly arguedbr that without the ability to detain every br migrant, it is necessary to send them back.br Texas and Missouri reportedly arguedbr that without the ability to detain every br migrant, it is necessary to send them back.br During oral arguments before the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the policy was not needed in order to comply with federal law.br During oral arguments before the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the policy was not needed in order to comply with federal law.br On this reading, every presidential br administration in an unbroken line for br the past quarter century has been in open br violation of the [Immigration and Nationality br Act]. If Congress wanted to mandate br those results, it would have spoken clearly, Elizabeth Prelogar, U.S. Solicitor General, via Fox News.br Justice Clarence Thomas echoed br Preloger's stance during oral arguments. .br Thomas reportedly questioned whether it was br an "odd" decision for Congress to pass a law br that the government was unable to follow.


User: Wibbitz Politics News

Views: 238

Uploaded: 2022-06-30

Duration: 01:31

Your Page Title